Thank you for selecting a date. Due to short notice on your chosen day, The Case Manager will do their best to accommodate your request. However, you may be offered an alternative date. If your request is urgent, please call 800.352.5267.
What is Pending? Another client has already requested this date for this Panelist. However, that request has not been confirmed. If you wish to be put next in line for this date, please complete and submit the form or call us at 800.352.5267.
Currently, calendars are only available for a select group of panelists while we assess the usefulness of this feature. If you would like to provide feedback about this feature, click HERE. To obtain availability, please click on Contact Case Manager.
JAMS Neutral Inquiry
T:
*Required Fields
Select up to 4
Practice Areas & Industries
X
Services
Type of Services*
X
In-Person/Virtual
Requested Hearing Format
Select preferred location*
X
Requested session dates within:
Request the same information for up to 8 additional panelist(s) below (optional):
Neutral Not Found
Maximum limit reached
Thank you for contacting JAMS.
Your inquiry is very important to us, and a JAMS associate will respond as soon as possible. We look forward to supporting your alternative dispute resolution needs.
General Biography
Practice Areas
Business Commercial
Civil Rights
Class Action & Mass Tort
Construction
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Governmental & Public Agency
Insurance
Personal Injury
Professional Liability
Real Property
Honors, Memberships, and Professional Activities
Background and Education
Hon. John C. Cratsley (Ret.) has been a full-time arbitrator and mediator since joining JAMS in 2011. He focuses his practice on a wide variety of matters, including contract, construction, employment and insurance disputes.
Prior to joining JAMS, Judge Cratsley spent 24 years on the Massachusetts Superior Court, notably serving as Chair of the Superior Court Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution. From 1999 to 2004, he served as Chair of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution.
ADR Experience and Qualifications
Judge Cratsley has extensive experience in the resolution of complex disputes in the following areas:
Business/Commercial
Civil Rights
Construction
Employment
Environmental
Government/Public Agency
Insurance
Maritime
Personal Injury and Torts
Professional Liability
Real Estate
Available to resolve disputes remotely through a number of videoconferencing options
Judge Cratsley adjudicated, mediated or arbitrated a wide variety of cases, including:
Representative Matters
Business Commercial
Family shareholder management disputes
Partner freeze-out disputes
Secured creditor disputes
Bank collection disputes
Claims under Chapter 93A of unfair and deceptive business practices
Claims to enforce non-compete agreements
Shareholder Stock Appraisal Litigation
Civil Rights
Gender Discrimination in Public Accommodations. After a four-week trial, nine women received a jury verdict for close to two million dollars for gender discrimination and wrongful business practices regarding their membership and use of facilities
Bourne v. Haverhill Golf and Country Club, 58 Mass.App.Ct. 56 (2003)
Prisoners’ Rights. After a four-week trial, the 8th Amendment claim of 15 prisoners involved in a standoff with guards, which included flooding of cells and health and safety issues, resulted in a jury verdict for plaintiffs regarding cruel and unusual punishment but no damages.
Ashman v. Marshall, Suffolk Superior Court, #2000-5618 (2007)
Construction
Condominium construction and home improvement disputes
Municipal construction and bonding disputes
Subcontractor disputes
Mechanics liens disputes
Manufacturing facility disputes
Employment Law
Mediation of employment discrimination matters involving claims of race, age, gender, and handicap discrimination, as well as claims for sexual harassment, retaliation, and termination in violation of public policy and/or contractual agreements. Also mediated claims of defamation relating to employment termination
Representative appellate decisions include Carter v. Commissioner of Correction, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 212 (1997) (race and gender discrimination); Handrahan v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., 43 Mass.App.Ct.13 (1997) (handicap discrimination); and Wright v. Shriners Hospital, 412 Mass.469 (1992) (termination in violation of public policy)
Governmental & Public Agency
Enforcement of Town By-Laws. See Boston Edison v. Town of Bedford, 444 Mass.775 (2005) (town by-law invalid as inconsistent with state law)
Permitting for Affordable Housing. See Wrentham v. Housing Appeals Committee, 69 Mass.App.Ct.449) (2007) (complaint dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies)
Judicial review of public agency employment arbitration decisions. See City v. Salaried Employees Local, 77 Mass.App.Ct.785 (2010) (affirming arbitrator award)
Judicial review, under 30A, of public agency appeals of pension and retirement decisions, as well as state agency appeals of environmental, public benefits, and various regulatory commissions’ decisions
Insurance
Managed for six years and ultimately issued multi-million dollar award to six insurance companies for chiropractic fraud by three individuals and their chiropractic clinics. Commerce Insurance et al. v. Corbett, Suffolk Superior Court, #2005-2012 (2011)
Blue Hill Chiropractic Group v. Commerce Insurance et al., #2005-2076 (2011)
Determination of responsibility for insurance coverage among multiple defendants (See Lemos v. Electrolux North America Inc., 78 Mass.App.Ct. 376 (2010)) and between homeowners and their insurance companies
Interpretation of policy exclusions and coverage provisions in auto, commercial, homeowners, and environmental cleanup disputes
Personal Injury
Wrongful death claims: See LeBlanc v. Logan Hilton Joint Venture, 78 Mass.App.Ct.699 (2011) (summary judgment decisions affirmed and reversed among multiple defendants)
Construction site and business accidents in a variety of settings. See Wilson v. Honeywell, 409 Mass.803 (1991) (jury instruction on res ipsa loquitur properly given)
Lead paint poisoning claims
Railroad accidents
Private camp accidents
Motorcycle accidents
Professional Liability
Legal and architectural malpractice claims
Medical malpractice trials in virtually every field of doctor and nursing care
Representative appellate decisions include English v. New England Medical Center, 405 Mass.423 (1989) (application of charitable immunity cap affirmed) and Darius v. City of Boston, 433 Mass.274 (2001) (discussion of med-mal discovery)
Real Property
Condominium disputes
Abutter disputes
Zoning appeals
Subdivision Development. See Latucca v. Robsham, 442 Mass.204 (2004) (breach of fiduciary duty and unfair and deceptive business practices among multiple parties developing land)
Right of First Refusal. See Uno Restaurants v. Boston Kenmore Realty Corp., 441 Mass.376 (2004) (defendant rejected plaintiff’s claimed right of first refusal)
Specific Performance. See Levenson v. L.M.I. Realty Corp., 31 Mass.App.Ct.127 (1991) (preliminary documents insufficiently detailed to create a binding real estate transaction)
Honors, Memberships, and Professional Activities
Completed Virtual ADR training conducted by the JAMS Institute, the training arm of JAMS.
Public Service
Currently serving as a part-time Special Judicial Magistrate, appointed by the Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Superior Court, hearing matters arising from the Drug Lab Litigation
Member, Trial Court Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution, 2004-2011
Chair, Supreme Judicial Court Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution, 1999-2004
Publications
Authored, LexisNexis Practical Guide: Massachusetts Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2014
Over a period of years, he wrote op-ed pieces in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on mediation themes: “Mediation Week—Addressing Objections to Mediation” (1999), “Mediation—A Device That is Here To Stay” (1998), and “Familiar Words on the Benefits of Mediation” (1996)
In 2006, the Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution published his article “Judicial Ethics and Judicial Settlement Practices: Time for Two Strangers to Meet.” He has since published two follow-up articles, “The American Experience with ‘Judicial Mediation’—Are More Rules Needed?” presented at the International Academic Symposium on Chinese and Foreign Mediation Experience, Langfang City, China; and “Judges and Settlement: So Little Regulation With So Much At Stake,” ABA Dispute Resolution Magazine, 2010
Speaker and Panelist
Co-Chair, JAMS Training Day, Civil Mediation Workshop, Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, May 2013
International Judicial Exchange Programs, including ADR presentations, China, Russia, France, Cambodia, and Japan
Team Leader, Trial Advocacy Workshop, Harvard Law School, 1990’s to present
Teaching Experience
Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School, 1972-present
Adjunct Faculty, Boston College Law School, 1994-present
Faculty, National Judicial College, University of Nevada, 1985-2000
Background and Education
Associate Justice, Massachusetts Superior Court, 1987-2011
Regional Administrative Judge for Civil Business, Suffolk County, 2005-2009
Regional Administrative Judge for Civil and Criminal Business, Norfolk County, 2002-2003
Chief, Public Protection Bureau, Department of the Massachusetts Attorney General, 1983-1987
Justice, Roxbury Division, District Court Department, 1973-1983
Member, Massachusetts Parole Board, 1972-1973
Staff Attorney and Chief Attorney, Community Legal Assistance Office, (now Cambridge and Somerville Legal Services), Cambridge, MA, 1968-1972
LL.M., Georgetown University Law Center, 1968
J.D., University of Chicago Law School, 1966
B.A., Swarthmore College, 1963
Counsel Comments
“The mediator, Judge Cratsley, was excellent and through his efforts the case settled shortly after the mediation. It never would have settled without his assistance.”
Home Office
HOME OFFICE
Boston, Massachusetts
One Boston Place, 201 Washington Street, Suite 3300, Boston, MA 02108
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More
Search our global directory of mediators, arbitrators and ADR professionals.
Counsel Comments