Thank you for selecting a date. Due to short notice on your chosen day, The Case Manager will do their best to accommodate your request. However, you may be offered an alternative date. If your request is urgent, please call 800.352.5267.
What is Pending? Another client has already requested this date for this Panelist. However, that request has not been confirmed. If you wish to be put next in line for this date, please complete and submit the form or call us at 800.352.5267.
Currently, calendars are only available for a select group of panelists while we assess the usefulness of this feature. If you would like to provide feedback about this feature, click HERE. To obtain availability, please click on Contact Case Manager.
Hon. Nancy Johnson (Ret.)
JAMS Neutral Inquiry
T:
*Required Fields
Select up to 4
Practice Areas & Industries
X
Services
Type of Services*
X
In-Person/Virtual
Requested Hearing Format
Select preferred location*
X
Requested session dates within:
Request the same information for up to 8 additional panelist(s) below (optional):
Neutral Not Found
Maximum limit reached
Thank you for contacting JAMS.
Your inquiry is very important to us, and a JAMS associate will respond as soon as possible. We look forward to supporting your alternative dispute resolution needs.
General Biography
Practice Areas
Accounting Finance
Business Commercial
Civil Rights
Cybersecurity & Privacy
Employment Law
Federal Law
Governmental & Public Agency
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Maritime Admiralty
Honors, Memberships, and Professional Activities
Background and Education
The Honorable Nancy Johnson (Ret.) served for 30 years as a U.S. magistrate judge in Houston, Texas, before joining JAMS in September 2020. Judge Johnson has authored hundreds of opinions on most areas of federal practice, including employment, governmental agencies, insurance, commercial litigation, intellectual property, contracts, torts, civil rights and admiralty. During her time on the bench, she was known for her strong legal writing, her no-nonsense attitude and her ability to cut to the heart of a dispute. She was also a sought-after mediator, settling hundreds of cases ranging from simple employment disputes to complex business and intellectual property disputes. Judge Johnson believes that mediation is an effective tool when both parties understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of the litigation process.
Judge Johnson has spoken on a variety of topics, including civil procedure, admiralty and alternative dispute resolution.
Prior to taking the bench, Judge Johnson defended the government in employment, tort and regulatory cases, and she pursued statutory enforcement and forfeiture actions brought by various federal agencies. She exclusively prosecuted white-collar and tax offenses for more than four years.
ADR Experience and Qualifications
Accounting/Finance
Admiralty
Arbitration
Business/Commercial
Civil Rights
Cybersecurity and Privacy
Employment
Government/Public Agency
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Personal Injury/Torts
Representative Matters
Accounting Finance
Vitol v. United States of America, 4: 18cv2275, 2020 WL 1442136 (Feb. 25, 2020): Considered whether butane qualified as a liquefied petroleum gas and whether alternative fuel tax credits were available for sale of butane when mixed with a taxable fuel such as diesel or gasoline
Crummey v. United States of America, 4:15cv980, 2017 WL 4286410 (Sept. 5, 2017): Considered whether there were fact issues concerning the application of payments to tax deficiencies in several years
Business Commercial
Giries v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 4:14cv1808, 2016 WL 1274743 (Apr. 1, 2016): Considered whether certain actions of former employee violated a noncompete clause in an employment contract
Dresser-Rand Company v. Schutte & Koerting Acquisition Company,4:12cv184, 2017 WL 2304443 (Mar. 15, 2017): Managed complex trade secret case and considered whether actions of defendant violated a preliminary injunction
Quicksilver Resources, Inc. v. Eagle Drilling, LLC, 4: 08cv868, 2010 WL 4115406 (Aug. 31, 2010): Considered validity of claims in light of the assignment of some, but not all, contractual rights and obligations
Civil Rights
Estate of Baker v. Castro, 4:15cv3495, 2018 WL 4762984 (Aug. 31, 2018): Found fact issues precluded summary judgment on qualified immunity and Monell liability in fatal police shooting
Charlot v. City of Houston, 4:15cv3028, 2017 WL 6060108, aff’d 2018 WL 6505519: Found qualified immunity for officers after a state magistrate authorized a body cavity search
Hicks-Field v. Harris County, Texas, aff’d 860 F.3d 803 (5th Cir. 2017): Considered whether decedent’s family raised a fact issue of Monell liability based on excessive use of force by jail personnel
Kossman Contracting Co. v. City of Houston, 2016 WL 11473826 (Feb. 17, 2016): Considered the constitutionality of the city’s minority contracting policy, which set up goals for awards of contracts to minority- and women-owned businesses
Cybersecurity & Privacy
DHI Group, Inc. v. Kent, 4:16cv1670, 2019 WL 3754859 (July 12, 2019): Considered whether data scrapes and backdoor intrusions into competitor’s database violated the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act, the Stored Communications Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Alliantgroup, L.P. v. Mols, 4:16cv3114, (Sept. 17, 2018): Issued death penalty sanctions after defendant wiped a laptop that was alleged to have improperly accessed the plaintiff’s database
Employment Law
Norman v. QES Wireline, LLC, 4:16cv2396, 2019 WL 4674957 (Aug. 30, 2019): Managed large FLSA class action involving wireline operators and engineers; interpreted motor carrier exemption in light of the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008
Senegal v. Fairfield Industries, Inc., 2018 WL 6079354 (Nov. 21, 2018): Managed FLSA class action involving seismic and marine workers, and interpreted various exemptions under the FLSA
Noel v. Shell Oil Company, 4:15cv1087, 2017 WL 4083604 (Aug. 16, 2017): Considered whether domestic parent company was properly deemed the employer for purposes of claims of race, gender and national origin discrimination by a foreign subsidiary and whether plaintiff had produced sufficient evidence of discrimination and retaliation to proceed to trial for actions taken by parent company
Strickler v. Hobby Lobby, 4:16cv1256, (Mar. 30, 2018): Considered whether plaintiff had presented sufficient evidence of retaliation based on the protected activity of speaking up for female co-workers
Woods v. Riverbend Country Club, Inc., 2018 WL 4443140 (Aug. 30, 2018): Upheld plan administrator’s determination of no coverage based on several Plan exemptions
Huerta v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 4:19cv1107, 2020 WL 974943 (Jan. 22, 2020): Considered whether the claims administrator breached a fiduciary duty to a plan participant when it failed to inform him of his options for the continuation of his life insurance policy after his termination
James v. Life Insurance Company of North America, 4:12cv2095, 2015 WL 4126580 (July 8, 2015): Considered whether decedent’s blood alcohol level being in excess of the state’s legal limit qualified as a “covered accident”
Governmental & Public Agency
Brown v. Harris County Housing Authority, 4:2018 WL 3080880: Considered whether the housing authority violated the Fair Housing Act, the Rehabilitation Act or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when it denied the plaintiff the ability to rent a three-bedroom house from her mother
Insurance
Garcia v. Liberty Insurance Corporation, 2019 WL 825883 (Jan. 17, 2019): Interpreted Texas estoppel rule and insurance contract after appraisal award payment was challenged as untimely
Greystone Multi-Family Builders, Inc. v. Gemini Insurance Company, 4:17cv921, 2018 WL 3080890 (Feb. 26, 2018): Considered whether an insurer had a duty to defend a claim arising out of defective construction of an apartment complex in light of certain policy exclusions and whether poor-quality workmanship fell within the definition of covered property damage
Intellectual Property
Baisden v. I’m Ready Productions, 4:08cv451, 2010 WL 3766533 (Sept. 22, 2010): Considered the rights of contracting parties to contested ownership of copyrights to novels, related stage plays and merchandise; the running of limitations; and whether equitable defenses were available
Moody v. Aqua Leisure International, Inc., 4:10cv1961, 2012 WL 5335842: Issued Markman ruling construing claims on a patented low-rise water ride
Sentinel Integrity Solutions, Inc. v. Mistras Group, Inc., 4:10cv1576, 2011 WL 13258115 (Sept. 1, 2011): Considered whether the plaintiff had produced sufficient evidence of likelihood of confusion to proceed to trial and whether an expert was qualified to render an opinion based on his experience and internet research
We-Flex, LLC v. NBSP, Inc., 4:11cv1078, 2012 WL 1440439 (Apr. 25, 2012): Considered whether the plaintiff stated a claim for violation of the False Marking Statute 35 U.S.C. § 292(a)
Maritime Admiralty
Topoil AB v. M/V Oruc Reis, 4:15cv460, 2016 WL 11474777 (Aug. 15, 2016): Considered whether under Swedish law, a choice-of-law provision in an order confirmation could be incorporated into a bunker sales contract and therefore give rise to a maritime lien
Agribusiness United DMCC v. Blue Water Shipping Company, Inc., 4:16cv2249, 2017 WL 1354144: Found no personal jurisdiction over freight forwarding company based on minimal business operations within Texas
Personal Injury Torts
Rubi v. MTD Products, Inc., 2016 WL 7638150 (Dec. 13, 2016): Considered whether to permit a defendant to file a third-party action against a settling defendant and whether contribution and indemnity were available against the settling party
Taylor v. Taser International, Inc., 4:17cv673, 2019 WL 1434213 (Mar. 29, 2019): Considered whether expert testimony met the minimum threshold for admissibility and whether the plaintiff raised triable issues of defective product design or manufacture and breach of an express or implied warranty
Trenado v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, 4:08cv249, 2010 WL 9546053 (Jan. 26, 2010): In consideration of various issues, including facts to find defendant strictly liable for design defects, whether plaintiff had evidence of a safer alternative design or a producing cause, whether there was sufficient evidence that the driver of the vehicle was negligent per se and whether any of several federal or state statutes preempted plaintiff’s claims of defective product design or permitted defenses to liability
Honors, Memberships, and Professional Activities
Completed Virtual ADR training conducted by the JAMS Institute, the training arm of JAMS.
Memberships and Affiliations
Member, Houston Bar Association
President, Federal Bar Association, 1991–1992
Member, Texas State Bar
Presentations
Speaker, “Mediation Before U.S. Magistrate Judges,” Houston Bar Association Alternative Dispute Resolution Section, 2020
Speaker, “Seizure of Vessels and Cargo,” University of Texas School of Law Admiralty and Maritime Law Conference, 2019
Panelist, “When to Hold and When to Scold: Ethical Aspects of Sentencing and Detention,” Southern District of Texas Bench & Bar Conference, 2019
Guest Lecturer, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Worcester College, Oxford University, Summer Abroad Program, University of Oklahoma College of Law, 2018
Panelist, “Motion Practice: What’s New and What Can be Improved,” Southern District of Texas Bench and Bar Conference, 2017
Speaker, “Update on Changes in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” Houston Bar Association Federal Practice Section, 2015
Background and Education
Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 1990–2020
Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District of Texas, 1982–1990
Criminal Division, Tax Prosecution Unit, 1986–1990
Civil Division, 1982–1986
Assistant Attorney General, Environmental Protection Division, State of Texas, 1980–1982
Assistant Attorney General, Administrative Agencies Division, State of Ohio, 1978–1980
J.D., University of Cincinnati, 1978
Moot Court, Tax Team
B.A., magna cum laude, University of Cincinnati, 1975
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More
Search our global directory of mediators, arbitrators and ADR professionals.