Thank you for selecting a date. Due to short notice on your chosen day, The Case Manager will do their best to accommodate your request. However, you may be offered an alternative date. If your request is urgent, please call 800.352.5267.
What is Pending? Another client has already requested this date for this Panelist. However, that request has not been confirmed. If you wish to be put next in line for this date, please complete and submit the form or call us at 800.352.5267.
Currently, calendars are only available for a select group of panelists while we assess the usefulness of this feature. If you would like to provide feedback about this feature, click HERE. To obtain availability, please click on Contact Case Manager.
JAMS Neutral Inquiry
T:
*Required Fields
Select up to 4
Practice Areas & Industries
X
Services
Type of Services*
X
In-Person/Virtual
Requested Hearing Format
Select preferred location*
X
Requested session dates within:
Request the same information for up to 8 additional panelist(s) below (optional):
Neutral Not Found
Maximum limit reached
Thank you for contacting JAMS.
Your inquiry is very important to us, and a JAMS associate will respond as soon as possible. We look forward to supporting your alternative dispute resolution needs.
General Biography
Practice Areas
Antitrust & Competition
Business Commercial
Civil Rights
Class Action & Mass Tort
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Health Care
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Maritime Admiralty
Personal Injury
Product Liability
Professional Liability
Real Property
Securities
Honors, Memberships, and Professional Activities
Background and Education
Hon. Sidney I. Schenkier (Ret.) joins JAMS following over 20 years of distinguished service as a United States magistrate judge for the Northern District of Illinois, including two terms as presiding magistrate judge. During his time on the bench, Judge Schenkier presided over approximately 40 jury trials, bench trials, and preliminary injunction hearings, which included cases raising patent and trademark claims, employment law claims, constitutional claims, medical malpractice and other personal injury claims, trade secrets claims, and other business disputes.
In addition, Judge Schenkier has mediated well over 2,000 cases involving a broad array of federal and state law claims, including major class action and multidistrict litigation cases. He works tirelessly with parties to identify an approach that will work for their matters. Judge Schenkier is known for his commitment to the process, believing that few litigated outcomes are superior to what parties can achieve by jointly taking control of the resolution of their dispute.
ADR Experience and Qualifications
Judge Schenkier has substantial experience adjudicating and mediating in the following areas:
Antitrust & Competition
Aviation
Business & Commercial
Civil Rights
Class Action & Mass Tort
Employment Law
Environmental Law
Federal Law
Health Care
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Maritime & Admiralty Law
Personal Injury/Torts
Product Liability
Professional Liability
Real Estate & Real Property
Special Master/Discovery Referee
Securities
Representative Matters
Antitrust & Competition
ACT, Inc. v. Cambridge Educ. Services, Inc. (14 C 3882): Successfully mediated a contract, trademark, and antitrust case.
Business Commercial
Arbitrated multiple consumer disputes.
Arbitrated an alleged deceptive and fraudulent practice in violation of the CA Consumer Legal Remedies Act, CA Unfair Competition Law, and CA False Advertising Law.
Arbitrated a consumer credit dispute.
Arbitrated a claim alleging breach of contract by a hospital.
Arbitrated a contract matter involving a casino development project.
Arbitrated by baseball arbitration, a dispute over the valuation of shares in a non-public entity.
Selected to arbitrate an emergency arbitration involving claims of breach of operation agreement and fiduciary duty.
Arbitrated a dispute between a real estate investment and development platform and its’ investors dealing with $100 million in capital raised and billions of dollars in active deals with investment partnerships with large banks and investor families.
Successfully mediated a contract dispute over contract termination and if there remains a 120-day transition after termination or if there is a minimum spend obligation.
Successfully mediated a breach of a consulting agreement and for contractually mandated payments tied to profitability.
Successfully mediated a contract dispute between a university and a faculty member.
Successfully mediated a contract dispute between a supplier of paper goods and a national retailer.
Successfully mediated a claim by an employer that former employees violated non-compete covenants.
Successfully mediated multiple cases involving litigation arising out of a major Ponzi scheme.
Successfully mediated a dispute between a software vendor and a law firm.
Successfully mediated a dispute involving a family business, resulting in a buyout.
Successfully mediated a fee dispute between attorneys.
Arch v. Roy Strom (15 C 8076 & 15 C 5709): Successfully mediated a ten-party dispute involving an admiralty claim, a state court property damage claim, and a federal court declaratory judgment action.
Civil Rights
Successfully mediated multiple excessive force cases.
Successfully mediated cases involving the deaths of detainees while in custody.
Successfully mediated multiple wrongful death cases of detainees in custody.
Dunn v. City of Chicago (04 C 6804): Successfully mediated a constitutional challenge to police practices involving three classes totaling several hundred thousand members that settled after 50 separate mediation sessions over three years.
Strong v. Tressman (16 C 4885): Successfully mediated a wrongful conviction case.
Shaw Suburban Media v. Thomas (07 C 3289): Successfully mediated a post-trial defamation and Section 1983 case involving an Illinois Supreme Court justice.
Uptown Tent City Org. v. City of Chicago (17 C 4518): Preliminary injunction hearing and ruling on a constitutional challenge of efforts to relocate homeless who had set up tent encampments under viaducts on Lake Shore Drive.
Class Action & Mass Tort
Arbitrated by baseball arbitration a post-settlement fee dispute in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case.
Successfully mediated multiple Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) class actions.
Successfully mediated multiple Illinois Right of Publicity Act (IRPA) class actions.
Successfully mediated multiple Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) class actions.
Served as a neutral in a class action mediation-arbitration case involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
Successfully mediated a class action involving nuisance from plant emissions.
Served as a special master deciding a post-settlement fee dispute in a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) class action/opt-in case.
Duffer v. United Airlines (13 C 3756): Successfully mediated a class action USERRA case arising out of the United Airlines/Continental Airlines merger.
Employment Law
Arbitrated multiple employment cases involving alleged discrimination based on race, sex, religion, age, sexual orientation, national origin, political affiliation, and disability.
Selected to arbitrate a workplace discrimination and termination case for a major discount retailer.
Successfully mediated multiple employment cases involving alleged discrimination based on race, sex, religion, age, sexual orientation, national origin, political affiliation, and disability. Examples:
Successfully mediated an employment discrimination case for a global science and technology manufacturer.
Successfully mediated a claim by an employee against a healthcare data company alleging disability discrimination and retaliation.
Successfully mediated claims under Title VII for race and ancestry discrimination and retaliation as well as termination of employment between an employee and an international freight shipping company.
Successfully mediated a claim between a former in-house counsel for a pharmaceutical company and her termination over alleged age discrimination.
Successfully mediated an employment discrimination case regarding a claim that a national bank forced an employee to resign after she took maternity leave while pregnant.
Successfully mediated multiple disputes involving claims for sexual harassment, hostile workplace, and constructive discharge.
McDade v. YRC Worldwide Inc. (14 C 1500): Successfully mediated a nine-plaintiff Title VII racial harassment case, post-trial.
Successfully mediated claims of wrongful discharge under the Illinois Whistleblower Act.
Successfully mediated many employment contract disputes.
Successfully mediated a claim regarding an employment breach of contract for failure to pay commission.
Successfully mediated a claim by an employer that former employees violated non-compete covenants.
Allen v. City of Chicago: Bench trial of a FLSA collective action involving claims for overtime for BlackBerry usage while not on duty; ruling after bench trial affirmed on appeal (10 C 3183); verdict affirmed on appeal.
Valdivia v. Township H.S. Dist. 214 (16 C 10333): Single-plaintiff FLSA case trial to a jury; verdict affirmed on appeal.
Environmental Law
Successfully mediated a class action involving nuisance from plant emissions.
Served as one of three neutral evaluators in connection with the Clean Air Act dispute.
Health Care
Arbitrated a claim alleging breach of contract by a hospital.
Selected as an arbitrator in a dispute concerning proper payment for medical services.
Selected to arbitrate a dispute over management and accounting fees remaining after payment of health insurance.
Successfully mediated a claim for reimbursement under ERISA health insurance benefits for a medical procedure where the parties disputed coverage.
Insurance
Arbitrated a contract dispute involving payment of an indemnity obligation.
Selected as one of three arbitrators as part of a panel for a dispute over denied insurance coverage for a business-interruption loss.
Successfully mediated an ERISA dispute concerning insurance coverage for an accidental death.
Successfully mediated a dispute concerning long-term disability.
Successfully mediated a dispute concerning coverage for a new drug.
Successfully mediated a dispute concerning buyback of policy, other defenses, and indemnity issues.
Successfully mediated a dispute concerning the use of expected mortality experience in the calculation of the cost of insurance.
Arch v. Roy Strom (15 C 8076 & 15 C 5709): Successfully mediated a ten-party dispute involving an admiralty claim, a state court property damage claim, and a federal court declaratory judgment action.
Intellectual Property
Arbitrated a claim involving the scope of a patent license agreement.
Successfully mediated a dispute between a software vendor and a law firm.
Globefill, Inc. v. Stoller Imports, Inc. (19 C 4593): Successfully mediated a trademark case.
Virgin Enterprises v. Jai Mundi (17 C 2715): Successfully mediated a trademark case and then successfully mediated a dispute regarding enforcement of the settlement.
ACT, Inc. v. Cambridge Educ. Services, Inc. (14 C 3882): Successfully mediated a contract, trademark, and antitrust case.
In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC (11 C 9308): Successfully mediated multiple patent lawsuits in multi-district litigation over a three-year period.
Sloan Valve Co. v. Zurn Indus. Inc. (10 C 204): Successfully mediated a patent case after multiple sessions over several years.
Lands’ End, Inc. v. Eddie Bauer LLC (10 C 5084): Successfully mediated a trade secret case.
Shanklin Corp. v. American Packaging Machinery, Inc. (95 C 1617): Bench trial on a patent infringement case.
Chemetall GmbH v. ZR Energy, Inc. (99 C 4334): Trade secret and contract case tried to a jury.
Planet Hollywood v. Hollywood Casino (96 C 4660): Trademark/trade dress bench trial; decision reported at 80 F.Supp.2d 815 (N.D. Ill. 1999); settled on appeal
Maritime Admiralty
Arch v. Roy Strom (15 C 8076 & 15 C 5709): Successfully mediated a ten-party dispute involving an admiralty claim, a state court property damage claim, and a federal court declaratory judgment action.
Personal Injury
Successfully mediated a wrongful death traffic accident.
Successfully mediated multiple excessive force cases.
Successfully mediated cases involving the deaths of detainees while in custody.
Successfully mediated multiple wrongful death cases of detainees in custody.
Pawlik v. Cochlear (17 C 7260): successfully mediated a personal injury/defective product case.
Aguirre v. Turner Constr. (05 C 515): Personal injury case (construction site accident) tried to a jury; verdict was affirmed on appeal.
Gicla v. United States (03 C 7246): Bench trial of a medical malpractice case; ruling after the bench trial was affirmed on appeal.
Shaw Suburban Media v. Thomas (07 C 3289): Successfully mediated a post-trial defamation and Section 1983 case involving an Illinois Supreme Court justice.
As a practitioner, defended two air crash cases in state and federal court.
Product Liability
Pawlik v. Cochlear (17 C 7260): Successfully mediated a personal injury/defective product case.
As a practitioner, defended two air crash cases in state and federal court.
Professional Liability
Successfully mediated multiple cases involving litigation arising out of a major Ponzi scheme.
Successfully mediated a legal malpractice case involving real estate transactions.
Real Property
Arbitrated a dispute between a real estate investment and development platform and its’ investors dealing with $100 million in capital raised and billions of dollars in active deals with investment partnerships with large banks and investor families.
Successfully mediated a legal malpractice case involving real estate transactions.
Securities
de David v. Araron Trading (10 C3502): Successfully mediated a commodities fraud case.
Honors, Memberships, and Professional Activities
Honoree, Outstanding Contributions to the Operation and Administration of Justice in the Federal Courts, American Bar Association, National Conference of Federal Trial Judges, Judicial Division, 2022
Completed Virtual ADR training conducted by the JAMS Institute, the training arm of JAMS, 2020
Distinguished Judicial Service Award, Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago, 2019
Adjunct Professor, Northwestern University School of Law
Clinical Trial Advocacy, 1988–2017
Civil Discovery, 2006–present
Instructor, Trial and Deposition, National Institute of Trial Advocacy
Member, Federal Magistrate Judges Association, 2003–present
Circuit Representative for the Seventh Circuit, 2003–2009
Member (Secretary, Treasurer, Vice President, President Elect, President and Immediate Past President), Executive Committee, 2009–2015
Recipient, Founders Award, 2016
Member, Magistrate Judge Committee, Judicial Conference of the United States (Appointed in 2015 by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts)
Selected Publications and Speaking Engagements
Discovery Mud fights: Why They Happen and How to Avoid Them, Litigation Journal, American Bar Association, Fall 2021
Judicial Profile, Hon. Sidney I. Schenkier, U.S. Magistrate Judge, Northern District of Illinois, The Federal Lawyer, May/June 2014
Judge Schenkier is a sought-after speaker on discovery, including e-discovery and electronically stored information and settlement. Representative presentations include the following:
Federal Bar Association Employment Law Program, 2020
ACI Paragraph IV Disputes Conferences, 2015, 2018 and 2019
Pincus Federal Court Boot Camp, 2018 and 2019
Sandpiper Partners/United Lex Innovations in E-Discovery, 2016, 2018 and 2019
Federal Bar Association Young Lawyers Division, Mediation Panel, 2018
Intellectual Property Lawyers Association of Chicago, Best Practices Panel, 2018
Linn Inn of Courts Program, “Judicial Perspectives on Settlement Conferences,” 2018
PLI Patent Litigation 2017, “Advances Techniques and Best Practices,” 2017
Illinois State Bar Association Settlement Seminar, 2017
Linn Inn of Court Panel on Mediation, 2017
ABA National Session on E-Discovery, Judges Panel, 2016
Illinois State Bar Association Panel, “ADR Options in Illinois Federal Court,” 2016
National E-Discovery Leadership Institute Program, 2015
ABA Annual Conference, “How Judges Approach E-discovery Dispute and View Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” 2015
Federal Bar Association, Employment Law Chapter, “Litigating Noncompetes in Federal Versus State Courts,” 2015
Illinois State Bar Association, “Settlement in Federal Court Cases,” 2015
Admissions
Supreme Court of the United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Illinois State Bar
Background and Education
Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 1998–2020
Presiding Magistrate Judge, 2008–2012
Member ex officio, District Court Executive Committee, 2008–2012
Member, District Court Rules Committee, 1999–2020
Member, James B. Moran Second Chance Program, 2010–2020
Partner, Litigation, Jenner & Block, 1981–1998
Bigelow Teaching Fellow, University of Chicago, 1980
Law Clerk, Chambers of U.S. District Judge Marvin Aspen, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 1979
B.S., Journalism, with distinction, Northwestern University, 1976
Counsel Comments
"We are extremely grateful for all the work you put into getting this case settled, and your patience as we worked through the non-monetary terms up against a court deadline. I don't think there's another mediator out there who could have gotten it done."
I’m sure I speak for all of us on this thread in noting that you did a tremendous job at this mediation, I hope you keep at this for a long time!"
"I am not going to breathe easy on this one until all is signed, sealed, and delivered, so I don't want to jinx it, but did want to say thank you for sticking with us through this torturous process. You're the best and I appreciate you!"
"Thanks so much for your excellent work and for assisting in getting this formerly intractable mess settled!"
"Your reputation as a strong peacemaker was definitively confirmed. I truly enjoyed your process and style. Thank you [for] getting this to the finish line."
"My new nickname for you is the miracle worker. All fun aside, we all left a little bit unhappy but knowing we were doing the right thing. Most of all, we all trusted in your judgment…a judge…who is honest, ethical and fair…Thank you […]."
"You proved once again why you are on the top of my list for mediators. I sincerely appreciate your efforts in bringing this matter to conclusion."
"It was a great day, and you did a remarkable job assisting us. Should we have any issues closing, we will most definitely revert to you on other cases."
"Thank you again for getting us [to resolution], and for checking in throughout. You bring wisdom, class, heart and humor to every settlement conference. It was a pleasure to have you participate in this case and we look forward to working with you again."
"Thank you for your great skill and tireless effort to help us get this resolved. It was clear you had really dug into the facts and the law, which was enormously helpful. I also appreciated your professional approach and good humor, which made the entire process as easy as it could be. I will certainly recommend you to my colleagues for future mediations."
"Thank you for your excellent services in mediating the dispute between our client and his former employer. You were the “right” mediator to facilitate a resolution between the parties. I enjoyed working with you and hope there will be occasions to do so again."
"This one is wrapped up. We also want to thank you for your hard work getting this over the finish line. We too enjoyed working with you, and look forward to the next opportunity."
"We have finalized the settlement. Thanks so much for staying on top of us, and for helping get this to the finish line."
"Judge, your efforts were pivotal here. Thanks for you preparation, time and skills."
"Thanks so much for your extremely able assistance. We certainly would not have gotten the matter resolved without you."
"Thank you, Judge Schenkier, for your persistence in getting this resolved. I will let [your referee] know how much we enjoyed working with you."
"Thank you very much [Judge Schenkier] for your hard work in getting the settlement. We would not have achieved [it] without your efforts and persistence in pursuing a resolution.... Again, thank you for keeping the negotiation going and arriving at a solid number."
"[T]hank you for helping us get this resolved. I can't say I suffered even one pang of regret yesterday about having left the litigation practice some 28 years ago, but I can say if I had more experiences working with people like you, I might have stuck it out little longer."
"Thank you again, Judge. In a case fraught with emotion... your efforts were instrumental in achieving settlement."
"Thank you again, Your Honor. We could not have done this without your guidance and we truly appreciate the opportunity to work with you!"
"I just wanted to say thank you. Your presence was like a guardian angel who protected everyone from themselves.'
This page is for general information purposes. JAMS makes no representations or warranties regarding its accuracy or completeness. Interested persons should conduct their own research regarding information on this website before deciding to use JAMS, including investigation and research of JAMS neutrals. See More
Search our global directory of mediators, arbitrators and ADR professionals.
Counsel Comments